iClickers: Writing Questions for "Classroom Response Systems"

After attending several workshops over more than a year, in Fall 2009 I started using iClickers in my World History survey course. (These are devices on which students push one of five buttons in response to a question an instructor poses, and the results can be displayed immediately on-screen.)

I summarized my own experience with the clickers by putting together all of the questions (and results) over the course of the quarter in one iClicker powerpoint presentation (saved as pdf). In sum, I was somewhat disappointed by my first attempt. First, as the announcements on my World History Course homepage show, I spent an inordinate amount of time getting stragglers to register their devices, from which the serial numbers were rubbing off. But more importantly, I wasn't very good at designing questions that promoted interaction (nor at leaving/taking time to discuss the results). Part of that was because of a technology glitch: I could not see the results as they came in, but only when the students saw them, so that I didn't have time to think about interpreting them before we all saw them. But mainly I didn't find my questions particularly suitable for discussion.

My main insight on designing questions is to ask about things like causes, and phrase answers that point to different aspects. Then one can ask students who chose a certain answer to explain why they did so. Thus not so much factual questions, but interpretation-dependent opinion questions are better.

In any case, UCSB Physics colleague Roger Friedman sent around a link to this "Best Practices for Writing Clicker Questions" entry on Derek Bruff's blog "Teaching with Classroom Response Systems". Bruff is an assistant director at Vanderbilt U's Center for Teaching, and author of Teaching with Classroom Response Systems: Creating Active Learning Environments (Jossey-Bass, 2009) ($31 and previewable at amazon). Searching "history" in the amazon preview yields some interesting pages: 67 on reading quizzes, 76 on conceptual understanding questions, 95 on peer evaluation of presentations, 99 on learning about student preconceptions (evolution).

As a sample of what I found useful in Bruff's 10 blog entry1/11/ is this post "Why writing clicker questions is so hard" on Ian Beatty's blog (with the comment): you not only need to explicitly articulate your learning goals, but you need to "engage, not assess" students, as the commenter (Bruff!) notes.

To add some content to this post, here's a list of types of clicker questions, from the first link on Bruff's Jan. 11 blog entry, a Univ. of British Columbia pdf Clicker Resource Guide, p. 6:

1) Quiz on the reading assigned in preparation for the class
2) Test recall of lecture point
3) Do a calculation or choose next step in a complex calculation
4) Survey students to determine background or opinions
5) Elicit/reveal pre-existing thinking
6) Test conceptual understanding
7) Apply ideas in new context/explore implications
8) Predict results of lecture demo, experiment, or simulation, video, etc.
9) Draw on knowledge from everyday life
10) Relate different representations (graphical, mathematical, …)

"Teaching with Classroom Response Systems' is a great blog, by the way, not of all tags in the right-hand column as links that bring up a thread of all entries that have that tag.

Web 2.0 and Historians

In October 2009 the first German conference on Web 2.0 was held (in the city of Siegen) "Web 2.0 und die Geschichtswissenschaft" (Web 2.0 and Historical Scholarship). Participant Prof. Peter Haber wrote a short hyperlinked overview on his blog (in German).

Each participant later summarized their presentation in thesis form on the Swiss HistNetWiki site. If you know German, those summaries are a great place to go to get an idea of how new web technologies are changing what historians do. Some of the things discussed: Information competence, use of blogs & wikis, collaboratively multi-authored publications, multi-media publications, "controlled" user feedback on publications, etc.

Reasons for this blog

Ok, I'm finally joining the bandwagon. Hitherto I've been adding interesting links and articles I've come across to my various webpages, be they for specific courses, or single-issue pages like those I maintain on Dachau, notetaking software, the quotation "First they came for the Communists...," my grandfather Herbert Marcuse (the Frankfurt School/New Left philosopher), and my own approach to history, Reception History. But this takes a lot of time, as I have to open up separate software and navigate to the correct page.

I'm now going to try to use this blog to do the same thing in a more efficient way, hoping to shorten the turnaround time, while still adding the most important things to those pages when I have time.

This is mostly intended for my own reference, so that I can find these things quickly when I want them, but if anyone else finds them useful, that is fine with me. (Please feel free to let me know by leaving me comments!)